|
Home | Highways and Bridges
Fed Lets States Delay Important Bridge Inspections
Is the federal government determined to have another bridge disaster like what happened in Minneapolis earlier this year? That would seem to be the case. MSNBC explains in a detailed article that the government has allowed states to delay inspections even on the more riskier bridges. Here are some bullet points from the article.
The Federal Highway Administration has allowed states to take advantage of a loophole in federal regulations, delaying bridge inspections to every four years instead of the two years normally required. While most states don't use this loophole, calling it unsafe, others drive a truck through it: Nationally, 30,000 bridges are listed on the delayed-inspection schedules, including 10,000 in Illinois alone and more than 3,000 on interstate highways.
Bridges in poor condition have been allowed on these delayed timetables in violation of federal guidelines. Although federal and state officials are bound by law to closely monitor the schedules, their own records show thousands of bridges on delayed-inspection schedules — despite being too decayed, too long or too heavily traveled to qualify.
"Fracture-critical" bridges like the Minneapolis bridge, which could collapse if one part fails, have remained on delayed-inspection schedules in violation of federal regulations. The records show 622 of these vulnerable bridges on four-year timetables.
Even after the deadly collapse in Minneapolis, the haphazard system of inspections continued, with federal authorities choosing not to require re-inspection of more than 18,000 fracture-critical bridges. In a survey of every state by msnbc.com, only five states and the District of Columbia said they began to recheck all their fracture-critical bridges. The rest checked only the few hundred bridges of the particular deck-truss design used in Minneapolis.
Federal agencies that own bridges have some of the worst records for on-time inspections. Nearly 3,000 bridges owned by U.S. government agencies went more than two years between checkups.
MSNBC also found that there are 1,630 bridges in the U.S. to violate a list of inspection criteria. They also uncovered that there are 622 fracture-critical bridges in the National Bridge Inventory that are on schedules for delayed inspection. On an ironic note MSNBC also found some bridges in need of inspection along federal highway administrator J. Richard Capka's route to and from work.
Posted on January 31, 2008
Permalink | Blogs linking to this post: Bloglines | BlogPulse | Technorati
| |
Just $1 Billion Approved to Fix Nation's Bridges
The U.S. Senate has approved a $1 billion measure to aid the nation's crumbling bridges. The bridge problem was brought into the spotlight when a Mississippi River bridge near downtown Minneapolis collapsed during the rush hour. The $1 billion will barely scratch the surface of the $65 billion that is needed to repair damaged infrastructure to brdiges nationwide according to an MSNBC news story.
The Senate approved the funds on a 60-33 vote as the Senate began debate on a $104.6 billion measure funding transportation and housing programs for the budget year beginning Oct. 1.
"Our bridges are deteriorating far faster than we can finance their replacement," said Sen. Patty Murray, D-Wash., lead sponsor of the bridge-repair funds. "More than one in every four bridges on U.S. highways is rated as deficient."
The article says a Democratic bill would augment the spending on bridge repair and replacement by 20% but President Bill is threatening to veto the bill.
The underlying bill faces a veto threat from President Bush, however, for exceeding his request by $4.4 billion.
"Fully 27 percent of our 600,000 bridges have aged so much that their physical condition or their ability to withstand current traffic levels is simply inadequate," Murray said. "Roughly half of these deficient bridges - or about 78,000 bridges across the nation - are structurally deficient."
Under the Bush Administration it appears that the U.S. roads and highways are being completely overlooked and allowed to deteriorate. You can view an interactive map of the numerous U.S. bridges rated as "structurally deficient" or "obsolete" here.
Posted on September 20, 2007
Permalink | Blogs linking to this post: Bloglines | BlogPulse | Technorati
| |
U.S. Orders Review of Failing Bridges
US officials have ordered a review of all bridges similar to the collapsed Minnesoat bridge. 1/4 of all U.S. bridges are rated as structurally deficient according to a DOT study. The BBC reports that over 700 structures will looked at.
More than 700 structures will be looked at after it emerged that the bridge in Minneapolis had been classified as "structurally deficient".
Divers have resumed their search for victims in the Mississippi river. At least eight people are still missing.
First Lady Laura Bush is set to visit Minneapolis and will go to the scene.
Unfortnately, there isn't enough money to fund the much needed bridge corrections. MSNBC.com reports that the Federal Highway Trust Fund will run completely dry in 2009. The article also lists the following problems with U.S. bridges.
33 percent of the nation's major roads are in "poor or mediocre condition."
36 percent of major urban highways are congested.
26 percent of bridges are "structurally deficient or functionally obsolete."
Funding for highway projects like fixing bridges has suffered from budget shortfalls over recent years.
Meanwhile, funding for improvements and maintenance continues to fall short. When Congress last passed a major highway funding bill in 2005, the Federal Highway Administration estimated it needed $375 billion to fund repair and improvement projects, but the final bill authorized just $286 billion.
On Thursday, Sen. Frank Lautenberg, D-N.J., a member of the Senate Commerce Committee, said that the nation's transportation infrastructure has been underfunded for years and that the Bush administration has threatened to veto proposals to increase funding.
"We want to get the bills done and want to get them increased at a sufficient amount," he said. "We spend over $3 billion a week on the war. So there is a lot of money that is being spent in other places that we have to recover and put into our highways. Because we face immediate danger in lots of places, and the public deserves better than that."
We can't have bridges that are too dangerous to cross so something will have to be done to fund all these bridge repairs. You can see an interactive map showing the structurally insufficient bridges state by state here.
Posted on August 3, 2007
Permalink | Blogs linking to this post: Bloglines | BlogPulse | Technorati
| |
Minnesota Bridge Collapses. How Safe Are Our Nation's Bridges?
Minnesota suffered a shocking bridge collapsed yesterday. Fifty cars and trucks plunged into the Mississippi rivers and dozens are hurt, injured and missing. A CNN article says four people have been confirmed dead and twenty to thirty people are missing. There are still 30 to 50 cars in the river. A security camera also captured the bridge collapse. For local coverage check www.StarTribune.com.
ABC's The Blotter blog reports that a Department of Transportation (DOT) study found that 160,000 of the nation's bridges - one fourth of all U.S. bridges -- are rated as "structurally deficient."
Department of Transportation (DOT) statistics show that 160,000, more than a quarter, of the nation's bridges are rated "structurally deficient" or "functionally obsolete," and many don't have proper warning signs restricting weight loads.
The 160,000 bridges rated deficient are not necessarily unsafe, according to DOT, as long as there are restrictions on the types of vehicles, weight or traffic volumes allowed on the bridge.
But a 2006 investigation by the DOT inspector general revealed that one out of every 10 "structurally deficient" highway bridges did not have load ratings that reflected the condition of the structure. In other words, posted signs told drivers the bridge could carry more than it could safely handle.
"In a worst-case scenario, the lack of a correct load rating or the lack of a weight limit posting could allow heavier vehicles to cross and cause severe structural damage or the collapse of a bridge," the report stated.
The article says a "structurally deficient" doesn't necessarily mean a bridge is in danger of a collapse but the article said that signs are not usually posted alerting drivers to the problem - meaning heavy trucks may cross the bridge when they should not. CNN says the Minnesota bridge was found to be structurally deficient in a 2005 study. The Minnesota bridge collapse is going to raise a lot of questions about whether enough resources are being given to our nation's roads and highways.
Update: An interactive map showing structurally deficient bridges in the U.S.
Posted on August 2, 2007
Permalink | Blogs linking to this post: Bloglines | BlogPulse | Technorati
| |
The World's Most Dangerous Road
A BBC article describes an extremely dangerous fifty mile stretch of road in Bolivia that kills 200 to 300 people each year.
But climb it does - just short of a lung-sapping five kilometres (three miles) above sea level, where even the internal combustion engine is forced to toil and splutter.
Then it pauses for a while on the snow-flecked crest of the Andes before pitching - like a giant white knuckle ride - into the abyss.
The road from Bolivia's main city, La Paz, to a region known as the Yungas was built by Paraguayan prisoners of war back in the 1930s.
Many of them perished in the effort. Now it is mainly Bolivians who die on the road - in their thousands.
There are even crosses along the road to mark locations where fatal accidents have occured. Mobile phones don't work on the road and if you get scared and stop for the night a flash flood could wash you away as you sleep -- apparently this has happened to truckers. Sounds like a stretch of road to avoid at all costs.
Posted on November 16, 2006
Permalink | Blogs linking to this post: Bloglines | BlogPulse | Technorati
| |
|
|